Source trailReferences

The works used to build the presentation and its reading-mode article. Entries follow APA 7th edition; links point to the publication, report or source page where available.

  1. Anderson, T. (2021, July 22). Everyone cites that “bugs are 100x more expensive to fix in production” research, but the study might not even exist. The Register. https://www.theregister.com/2021/07/22/bugs_expense_bs/
  2. Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakcı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). Generative AI without guardrails can harm learning: Evidence from high school mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(26), Article e2422633122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2422633122
  3. Belward, B. (2026, June 5). Move fast, then fix things—What we learned building Register early career teachers. DfE Digital, Data and Technology. https://dfedigital.blog.gov.uk/2026/06/05/move-fast-then-fix-things-what-we-learned-building-register-early-career-teachers/
  4. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1243–1289. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
  5. Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379
  6. Beyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems. Morgan Kaufmann.
  7. Bitner, M. J., Ostrom, A. L., & Morgan, F. N. (2008). Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation. California Management Review, 50(3), 66–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166446
  8. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2020). Desirable difficulties in theory and practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.003
  9. Boehm, B. W., & Basili, V. R. (2001). Software defect reduction top 10 list. Computer, 34(1), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.1109/2.962984
  10. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
  11. Brunmair, M., & Richter, T. (2019). Similarity matters: A meta-analysis of interleaved learning and its moderators. Psychological Bulletin, 145(12), 1029–1052. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000209
  12. Bulger, M., McCormick, P., & Pitcan, M. (2017). The legacy of inBloom. Data & Society. https://datasociety.net/library/the-legacy-of-inbloom/
  13. Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021). To trust or to think: Cognitive forcing functions can reduce overreliance on AI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), Article 188. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449287
  14. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543053004445
  15. Clough, C. (2015, April 15). Just in: LAUSD seeking refund for iPads with Pearson software. LA School Report. https://www.laschoolreport.com/just-in-lausd-seeking-refund-for-ipads-with-pearson-software/
  16. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O’Shea (Eds.), New directions in educational technology (pp. 15–22). Springer.
  17. Cristia, J., Ibarrarán, P., Cueto, S., Santiago, A., & Severín, E. (2017). Technology and child development: Evidence from the One Laptop per Child program. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9(3), 295–320. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20150385
  18. Design Council. (2019). Framework for innovation. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/framework-for-innovation/
  19. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001005
  20. Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
  21. Government Digital Service. (n.d.). Accessibility strategy. GOV.UK Design System. https://design-system.service.gov.uk/accessibility/accessibility-strategy/
  22. Gray-Lobe, G., Keats, A., Kremer, M., Mbiti, I., & Ozier, O. (2022). Can education be standardized? Evidence from Kenya [Working paper]. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4129184
  23. Hornbæk, K., & Law, E. L.-C. (2007). Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 617–626). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240722
  24. House of Commons Education and Skills Committee. (2005). UK e-University (HC 205). The Stationery Office. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmeduski/205/205.pdf
  25. Instructure. (2024, June 24). New LearnPlatform by Instructure report finds increases in more unique digital tools accessed by K–12 institutions, students, and teachers. https://www.instructure.com/press-release/new-learnplatform-instructure-report-finds-increases-more-unique-digital-tools
  26. Janssen, F. J. J. M., Könings, K. D., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2017). Participatory educational design: How to improve mutual learning and the quality and usability of the design? European Journal of Education, 52(3), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12229
  27. Kozma, R. B. (1994). Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299087
  28. Latimier, A., Peyre, H., & Ramus, F. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the benefit of spacing out retrieval practice episodes on retention. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 959–987. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09572-8
  29. Lewin, C., Smith, A., Morris, S., & Craig, E. (2019). Using digital technology to improve learning: Evidence review. Education Endowment Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED612157.pdf
  30. Mauro, C. L., & Thurman, P. W. (2019, January 25). Critical analysis: Why McKinsey’s “The business value of design” report ultimately misstates the value of UX design and design overall. Medium. https://medium.com/@PulseUX/why-mckinseys-the-business-value-of-design-report-ultimately-misstates-the-value-of-ux-design-dd6fc0b236ab
  31. Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2014). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 279–315). Cambridge University Press.
  32. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting educational design research (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  33. Medlock, M. C., Wixon, D., Terrano, M., Romero, R., & Fulton, B. (2002). Using the RITE method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Usability Professionals Association Conference.
  34. Nakamura, W. T., Oliveira, E. H. T., & Conte, T. (2017). Usability and user experience evaluation of learning management systems: A systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (Vol. 3, pp. 97–108). SCITEPRESS. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006363100970108
  35. Newcombe, T. (2015, May 11). A cautionary tale for any government IT project: L.A.’s failed iPad program. Governing. https://www.governing.com/archive/gov-tablets-los-angeles-ipad-apple-schools.html
  36. Nielsen, J., Berger, J. M., Gilutz, S., & Whitenton, K. (n.d.). Return on investment (ROI) for usability (4th ed.). Nielsen Norman Group. https://opus.bsz-bw.de/fhdo/files/2166/ROI_for_Usability_4th_Edition.pdf
  37. Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
  38. Rae, J. (2016). Design Value Index exemplars outperform the S&P 500 Index (again) and a new crop of design leaders emerge. Design Management Review, 27(4), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/drev.12040
  39. Right to Education Initiative. (2017, February 17). Kenyan court upholds the closure of Bridge International Academies schools over failure to respect standards. https://www.right-to-education.org/fr/node/893
  40. Robinson, C. D., Gormley, D., Ribeiro, A. T., & Loeb, S. (2026). Access is not enough: Human support improves engagement with AI tutoring [Working paper]. EdWorkingPapers.com. https://doi.org/10.26300/pz7p-p388
  41. Romo, V. (2014, November 19). Long-awaited LAUSD report calls MiSiS “grossly inadequate.” LA School Report. https://www.laschoolreport.com/long-awaited-lausd-report-calls-misis-grossly-inadequate/
  42. Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
  43. Rumsey, R. (2023, December 16). You may have seen this image before [LinkedIn post]. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/posts/ryanrumsey_you-may-have-seen-this-image-before-maybe-activity-7141805603970039808-55bm
  44. Sanders, E. B.-N., & Stappers, P. J. (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design. CoDesign, 4(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
  45. Sheppard, B., Sarrazin, H., Kouyoumjian, G., & Dore, F. (2018, October 25). The business value of design. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-business-value-of-design
  46. Shostack, G. L. (1984). Designing services that deliver. Harvard Business Review, 62(1), 133–139.
  47. Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2011). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. BIS Publishers.
  48. Sundararajan, N., & Adesope, O. O. (2020). Keep it coherent: A meta-analysis of the seductive details effect. Educational Psychology Review, 32, 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09522-4
  49. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361
  50. Tetzlaff, L., Simonsmeier, B., Peters, T., & Brod, G. (2025). A cornerstone of adaptivity: A meta-analysis of the expertise reversal effect. Learning and Instruction, 98, Article 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102142
  51. Wang, R. E., Ribeiro, A. T., Robinson, C. D., Loeb, S., & Demszky, D. (2025). Tutor CoPilot: A human-AI approach for scaling real-time expertise (EdWorkingPaper 24-1054). Annenberg Institute at Brown University. https://edworkingpapers.com/sites/default/files/ai24_1054_v2.pdf
  52. Wayne, H. (2021, July 19). I ****ing hate science. Computer Things. https://buttondown.com/hillelwayne/archive/i-ing-hate-science/
  53. Xie, H., Zhou, Z., & Liu, Q. (2018). Null effects of perceptual disfluency on learning outcomes in a text-based educational context: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 745–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9442-x