| A |
|---|
| Absolute and relative risk | Absolute risk is the chance of an outcome. Relative risk compares two chances as a ratio, so 'twice as likely' can describe a rise from 1 to 2 in 1,000. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53–96. doi ↗
- Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
|
|---|
| Analysis of variance (ANOVA) | A test of whether the means of three or more groups differ, made by comparing the variation between groups with the variation inside them. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd.
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
|
|---|
| B |
|---|
| Base rate | How common an outcome is in the population before any test or model is applied. R15 How common an outcome is in a group before any prediction is made. | | - Bowers, A. J., Sprott, R., & Taff, S. A. (2013). Do we know who will drop out? A review of the predictors of dropping out of high school: Precision, sensitivity, and specificity. The High School Journal, 96(2), 77–100. doi ↗
- Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53–96. doi ↗
- Meehl, P. E., & Rosen, A. (1955). Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 194–216. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Bayes' theorem | The rule for updating the probability of something in the light of new evidence, combining how likely it was beforehand with how well the evidence fits. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704. doi ↗
- Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2013). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). CRC Press. doi ↗
|
|---|
| C |
|---|
| Cohen's d | A standardised effect size that divides the difference between groups by the spread, so studies that use different tests can be compared (Cohen, 1988). | | - Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Cohen's kappa | A measure of how far two raters agree when sorting items into categories, corrected for the agreement expected by chance. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi ↗
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Confidence interval | A range of plausible values for a true figure, built by a method that captures it a stated share of the time. | | - Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi ↗
- Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Confounder | A factor that influences both a supposed cause and its outcome, creating a misleading association. | | - Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
- Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press.
|
|---|
| Correlation coefficient | A number from −1 to +1 that shows how closely two variables move together in a straight line. Usually written r, it says nothing about what causes what. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Rodgers, J. L., & Nicewander, W. A. (1988). Thirteen ways to look at the correlation coefficient. The American Statistician, 42(1), 59–66. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Counterfactual | What would have happened without the intervention. Never observed directly. R13 What would have happened to the same people without the change. Never observed; estimated by a control group. | | - Kohavi, R., Tang, D., & Xu, Y. (2020). Trustworthy online controlled experiments: A practical guide to A/B testing. Cambridge University Press. doi ↗
- Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
- Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Cronbach's alpha | A figure from 0 to 1 showing how consistently the items in a test or questionnaire measure the same thing. Values of about 0.7 and above are usually accepted. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi ↗
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
|
|---|
| M |
|---|
| Margin of error | The amount added to and subtracted from a survey estimate to give its confidence interval, usually at 95 per cent. It shrinks as the sample grows. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Mean | The sum of a set of values divided by how many there are. It is what most people call the average, and a few extreme values can pull it a long way. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Wheelan, C. (2013). Naked statistics: Stripping the dread from the data. W. W. Norton.
|
|---|
| Median | The middle value when a set of values is put in order. Half lie above it and half below, so extreme values barely move it. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Wheelan, C. (2013). Naked statistics: Stripping the dread from the data. W. W. Norton.
|
|---|
| Meta-analysis | A statistical method that pools the effect sizes from many studies of the same question into one weighted average. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
- Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3–8. doi ↗
- Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Missing data | Values that were never recorded, such as pupils absent on test day. If they are missing for a reason linked to the outcome, analysing only complete cases biases the result. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–592. doi ↗
- Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data (2nd ed.). Wiley.
|
|---|
| Multiple comparisons | The problem that running many tests makes it likely some will come out significant by chance alone. Corrections such as Bonferroni's raise the bar for each test. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. doi ↗
|
|---|
| N |
|---|
| Normal distribution | The symmetrical, bell-shaped distribution in which most values sit near the mean and extreme values are rare. Many common tests assume it. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Wheelan, C. (2013). Naked statistics: Stripping the dread from the data. W. W. Norton.
|
|---|
| Null hypothesis | The assumption of no effect that a significance test measures data against. | | - Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. doi ↗
- Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. doi ↗
|
|---|
| P |
|---|
| p-hacking | Running many analyses on the same data, which raises the odds that one crosses 0.05 by chance (Simmons et al., 2011). | | - Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi ↗
|
|---|
| p-value | The probability of data at least this extreme if there were no real effect. | | - Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. doi ↗
- Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. doi ↗
- Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Percentile | The value below which a given percentage of results fall. A student at the 80th percentile scored higher than 80 per cent of the group. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Wheelan, C. (2013). Naked statistics: Stripping the dread from the data. W. W. Norton.
|
|---|
| Population | The whole group a conclusion is meant to apply to. | | - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
|
|---|
| Power | The probability a study detects an effect of a given size if it truly exists. | | - Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. doi ↗
|
|---|
| R |
|---|
| R-squared | The proportion of the variation in an outcome that a regression model accounts for, from 0 to 1. A high value does not show that the model is causal. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press. doi ↗
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
|
|---|
| Randomisation | Assigning units to groups by chance, so groups are balanced on measured and unmeasured factors. | | - Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press.
- Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
|
|---|
| Regression discontinuity | A design that compares students just above and just below a cutoff, such as a scholarship score, who are otherwise comparable. Only valid near the cutoff (Thistlethwaite & Campbell, 1960). | | - Thistlethwaite, D. L., & Campbell, D. T. (1960). Regression-discontinuity analysis: An alternative to the ex post facto experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(6), 309–317. doi ↗
- Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press.
|
|---|
| Regression to the mean | Extreme results are partly luck, and luck doesn't repeat, so schools chosen because they scored lowest will tend to score higher next time, with or without help. | | - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Galton, F. (1886). Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary stature. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 15, 246–263. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Reliability | The consistency of a measure across items, occasions or raters. | | - Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. doi ↗
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. doi ↗
|
|---|
| S |
|---|
| Sample | The subset of a population actually observed. | | - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
|
|---|
| Selection bias | Distortion that arises when the people in a sample or a comparison group differ systematically from those they are meant to represent, such as schools that volunteered for a pilot. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press.
- Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Sensitivity and specificity | Sensitivity is the share of students who need help that a tool catches; specificity is the share of those who don't that it clears. No threshold removes the trade-off between them. | | - Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W., Kurz-Milcke, E., Schwartz, L. M., & Woloshin, S. (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(2), 53–96. doi ↗
- Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.
|
|---|
| Simpson's paradox | A pattern that appears in every subgroup but reverses or vanishes when the subgroups are combined, because the groups differ in size or make-up. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Charig, C. R., Webb, D. R., Payne, S. R., & Wickham, J. E. A. (1986). Comparison of treatment of renal calculi by open surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. BMJ, 292(6524), 879–882. doi ↗
- Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
- Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Skew | Lopsidedness in a distribution, with a long tail on one side. In skewed data such as time spent on a platform, the mean and the median can differ widely. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
|
|---|
| Standard deviation | Roughly the typical distance of values from their mean. | | - Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
- Kunin, D., Guo, J., Devlin, T. D., & Xiang, D. (n.d.). Seeing theory: A visual introduction to probability and statistics. Brown University. seeing-theory.brown.edu ↗
|
|---|
| Standard error | The typical wobble of an estimate across repeated samples. Shrinks with the square root of sample size. | | - Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi ↗
- Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: Learning from data. Pelican.
|
|---|
| Standard error of measurement | An estimate of how far an observed score might sit from a student's true score, which makes a single score a range, not a point. | | - Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
|
|---|
| Statistical significance | A p-value below a chosen threshold, conventionally 0.05. A convention, not a verdict. | | - Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. doi ↗
- Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. doi ↗
- Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. doi ↗
|
|---|
| T |
|---|
| t-test | A test of whether the difference between two means is larger than chance variation alone would plausibly produce. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Student. (1908). The probable error of a mean. Biometrika, 6(1), 1–25. doi ↗
- Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE.
|
|---|
| Type I and Type II errors | A Type I error is concluding there is an effect when there is none. A Type II error is failing to detect an effect that is real. | - R18Basic statistics for educational technologistsFrom the field · not in the guide
| - Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. doi ↗
- Neyman, J., & Pearson, E. S. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 231, 289–337. doi ↗
|
|---|