Explore / Counterposition
“Empathy is user research”
Empathy motivates research. It does not replace observation.
Published September 2026
The strongest formulation
Designers who care about the people they design for ask better questions and notice more. Empathy keeps the user present in decisions that would otherwise be made for the organisation’s convenience.
Why it is attractive
It is quick, it feels virtuous and it needs no recruitment. A team that has imagined the user’s day believes it has understood it.
Where it holds
It holds as a disposition: the willingness to take someone else’s situation seriously and to go and look at it. That is a good reason to do research.
Where it breaks
It breaks when feeling stands in for finding out. Imagined users resemble the team, vivid cases crowd out typical ones, and what people say they do differs from what they do.
What evidence matters
Nisbett and Wilson (1977) on how poorly people report the reasons for their own behaviour, and Bloom (2016) on empathy as a spotlight that favours the near and the similar. What matters is observed behaviour in context, from a sample that reaches beyond the enthusiasts, with observation kept separate from interpretation.
More precisely
A more precise version
Empathy is a reason to do user research, and the research is the observation of what people actually do, in context, across more than the people who came forward.
Where next
Follow this idea
Operationalise it
Discovery research: interviews, observation and context (opens in a new tab)Guide
Related argument
A bias is a design briefNote
Related argument
Design thinking, used honestly (opens in a new tab)Guide