| C |
|---|
| Communicative language teaching | An approach that treats communication as both the means and the goal of language learning. Its durable forms combine meaningful use with attention to linguistic form (Spada, 2007). | | - Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271–288). Springer. doi ↗
- Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Computational thinking | Solving problems and designing systems by drawing on concepts from computer science, such as abstraction, decomposition and algorithms. Wing (2006) argued it belongs in every child’s analytical ability. | | - Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. doi ↗
- Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Sánchez Viveros, B. (2019). The cognitive benefits of learning computer programming: A meta-analysis of transfer effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 764–792. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Conceptual and procedural knowledge | Understanding why a method works, and being able to carry out its steps. The two develop iteratively, each supporting later gains in the other (Rittle-Johnson et al., 2001). | | - Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 346–362. doi ↗
- Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. doi ↗
- Ofsted. (2021e). Research review series: Mathematics. gov.uk ↗
|
|---|
| Concrete–pictorial–abstract | A teaching sequence from physical materials, through pictures and diagrams, to symbols. Singapore’s primary mathematics curriculum has used it since 1981 (Kaur, 2014). | | - Kaur, B. (2014). Evolution of Singapore’s school mathematics curriculum. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 24–36). MERGA. files.eric.ed.gov ↗
- Kaur, B. (2019). The why, what and how of the ‘Model’ method: A tool for representing and visualising relationships when solving whole number arithmetic word problems. ZDM, 51(1), 151–168. doi ↗
- Ofsted. (2021e). Research review series: Mathematics. gov.uk ↗
|
|---|
| D |
|---|
| Disciplinary knowledge | Knowledge of how a subject generates, tests and revises its claims. In geography it “considers how geographical knowledge originates and is revised” (Ofsted, 2021c). | | - Ofsted. (2021c). Research review series: Geography. gov.uk ↗
- Ofsted. (2021b). Research review series: Science. gov.uk ↗
- Ofsted. (2021a). Research review series: History. gov.uk ↗
|
|---|
| Disciplinary literacy | The reading, writing and talk particular to a subject, such as sourcing a document in history or reading a proof line by line in mathematics (Shanahan & Shanahan, 2008). | | - Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59. doi ↗
- Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(4), 393–429. doi ↗
- Wineburg, S. S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 73–87. doi ↗
|
|---|
| F |
|---|
| Fluency | Performing a skill accurately and quickly enough that it no longer occupies attention. In reading it covers accurate, smooth oral reading; in mathematics, Ofsted (2021e) distinguishes this automaticity from conceptual knowledge. | | - Ofsted. (2021e). Research review series: Mathematics. gov.uk ↗
- Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. doi ↗
- Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
|
|---|
| Fundamental movement skills | Basic learned movement patterns, grouped as locomotor, stability and manipulative skills, which “do not occur naturally” and must be taught (Ofsted, 2022; Logan et al., 2012). | | - Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., & Lucas, W. A. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(3), 305–315. doi ↗
- Ofsted. (2022). Research review series: PE. gov.uk ↗
- Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290–306. doi ↗
|
|---|
| M |
|---|
| Mathematics framework (SG) | Singapore’s curriculum framework with mathematical problem solving as its primary focus, drawn as a pentagon of five inter-related components: concepts, skills, processes, attitudes and metacognition. It has held its shape since 1990 (Kaur, 2014). | | - Kaur, B. (2014). Evolution of Singapore’s school mathematics curriculum. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 24–36). MERGA. files.eric.ed.gov ↗
- Ministry of Education, Singapore. (n.d.-a). Primary school curriculum: Syllabus. Retrieved September 18, 2026, from moe.gov.sg ↗
|
|---|
| Misconceptions and conceptual change | Prior explanations that conflict with accepted ones, and the process of replacing them. Posner et al. (1982) set four conditions: dissatisfaction, and a new conception that is intelligible, plausible and fruitful. | | - Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. doi ↗
- Pacaci, C., Ustun, U., & Ozdemir, O. F. (2024). Effectiveness of conceptual change strategies in science education: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(6), 1263–1325. doi ↗
- Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Motor competence | How well a person performs a range of movement skills. Stodden et al. (2008) treat it as a mechanism that drives later physical activity, fitness and perceived competence. | | - Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia, C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290–306. doi ↗
- Robinson, L. E., Stodden, D. F., Barnett, L. M., Lopes, V. P., Logan, S. W., Rodrigues, L. P., & D’Hondt, E. (2015). Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Medicine, 45(9), 1273–1284. doi ↗
- Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., & Lucas, W. A. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38(3), 305–315. doi ↗
|
|---|
| N |
|---|
| Nature of science | How scientific knowledge is generated, justified and revised: tentative, evidence-based, theory-laden and socially situated. It needs explicit teaching rather than absorption through practical work (Lederman et al., 2002). | | - Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. doi ↗
- Ofsted. (2021b). Research review series: Science. gov.uk ↗
- Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2022). Science teaching and learning syllabus: Primary Three to Six (Implementation starting with 2023 Primary Three cohort; updated January 2026). moe.gov.sg ↗
|
|---|
| Numeracy | Confident, accurate use of number and measurement in everyday and subject contexts. Like literacy, it is a gateway to other subjects and is reshaped inside each of them. | | - Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. doi ↗
- Ofsted. (2021e). Research review series: Mathematics. gov.uk ↗
|
|---|
| P |
|---|
| Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) | The knowledge of how to represent and teach a particular subject to particular learners (Shulman, 1986). Its home in this series is C05, which covers it and TPACK in depth. C05 The knowledge that makes a subject teachable: useful representations and examples, and what makes a topic easy or hard for particular learners (Shulman, 1986). Shulman (1987) called it a "special amalgam of content and pedagogy". | | - Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi ↗
- Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. doi ↗
- Kansanen, P. (2009). Subject-matter didactics as a central knowledge base for teachers, or should it be called pedagogical content knowledge? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(1), 29–39. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Phonics | Teaching the relationships between letters and sounds so that pupils can decode and spell. Systematic phonics has meta-analytic support (Ehri et al., 2001) and is one strand of reading, not the whole. | | - Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. doi ↗
- Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi ↗
- Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. Department for Education and Skills.
|
|---|
| Physical literacy | “The motivation, confidence, physical competence, knowledge and understanding to value and take responsibility for engagement in physical activities for life”, in the definition quoted by Edwards et al. (2017), after Whitehead (2001). | | - Whitehead, M. (2001). The concept of physical literacy. European Journal of Physical Education, 6(2), 127–138. doi ↗
- Edwards, L. C., Bryant, A. S., Keegan, R. J., Morgan, K., & Jones, A. M. (2017). Definitions, foundations and associations of physical literacy: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 47(1), 113–126. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Pólya’s four steps | A long-standing structure for problem solving: understand the problem, devise a plan, carry it out, and look back at the solution (Pólya, 1945). | | - Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
|
|---|
| Productive struggle | Effortful attempts at a problem before instruction, where the difficulty is at the edge of what a learner can do and is followed by teaching that consolidates the attempt (Sinha & Kapur, 2021). | | - Sinha, T., & Kapur, M. (2021). When problem solving followed by instruction works: Evidence for productive failure. Review of Educational Research, 91(5), 761–798. doi ↗
- Kapur, M. (2008). Productive failure. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 379–424. doi ↗
|
|---|
| R |
|---|
| Reading comprehension | Understanding what is read. In the simple view it is the product of decoding and language comprehension, so it fails if either is weak (Gough & Tunmer, 1986). | | - Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi ↗
- Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi ↗
- Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
|
|---|
| Reading wars | The long argument over how beginners should be taught to read, phonics first or meaning first. Most disagreement now is about emphasis, sequence and decodable texts, not whether to teach phonics (Castles et al., 2018). | | - Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi ↗
- Goodman, K. S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135. doi ↗
- Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. doi ↗
|
|---|
| S |
|---|
| Scarborough’s reading rope | A widely used elaboration of the simple view of reading, in which word recognition becomes increasingly automatic and language comprehension increasingly strategic as the two bundles twist together (Scarborough, 2001). | | - Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 97–110). Guilford Press.
- Reading Universe. (n.d.). Understanding the simple view of reading and Scarborough’s rope. Retrieved September 18, 2026, from readinguniverse.org ↗
|
|---|
| Scientific inquiry | The practices by which scientists ask questions, gather and interpret evidence and build explanations. Singapore’s syllabus groups these as ways of thinking and doing, nature of scientific knowledge, and science in society (Ministry of Education, Singapore, 2022). | | - Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2022). Science teaching and learning syllabus: Primary Three to Six (Implementation starting with 2023 Primary Three cohort; updated January 2026). moe.gov.sg ↗
- Ofsted. (2021b). Research review series: Science. gov.uk ↗
- Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Second language acquisition | The study of how people learn an additional language. Norris and Ortega (2000) found focused instruction effective and explicit types more effective than implicit ones. | | - Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. doi ↗
- Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271–288). Springer. doi ↗
- Ofsted. (2021d). Research review series: Languages. gov.uk ↗
|
|---|
| Signature pedagogies | The characteristic forms of teaching by which a field prepares newcomers, each with a surface, a deep and an implicit structure (Shulman, 2005). | | - Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–59. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Simple view of reading | Reading modelled as the product of decoding and language comprehension, so a weak reader is weak on one strand, the other, or both, and each case needs different teaching (Gough & Tunmer, 1986). | | - Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi ↗
- Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi ↗
- Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report. Department for Education and Skills.
|
|---|
| Spatial thinking in geography and GIS | Reasoning with maps, scale, location and spatial data, including geographic information systems, as a geographer’s practice (Ofsted, 2021c). Spatial ability as a psychological construct is covered in C09. | | - Ofsted. (2021c). Research review series: Geography. gov.uk ↗
- National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. National Academies Press.
|
|---|
| STEM and STEAM | Labels for grouping science, technology, engineering and mathematics, with the arts added in STEAM. They describe arrangements of curriculum time, not a method, and their measured effects vary widely (Becker & Park, 2011). | | - Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12(5–6), 23–37. eric.ed.gov ↗
- National Academy of Engineering & National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research (M. Honey, G. Pearson, & H. Schweingruber, Eds.). National Academies Press. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Strands of mathematical proficiency | Five interwoven and interdependent strands in the development of proficiency in mathematics: conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning and productive disposition (Kilpatrick et al., 2001). | | - Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Subject pedagogy (Fachdidaktik) | The continental European field devoted to teaching a particular subject, including what is worth teaching and why. Kansanen (2009) treats it as broader than pedagogical content knowledge. | | - Kansanen, P. (2009). Subject-matter didactics as a central knowledge base for teachers, or should it be called pedagogical content knowledge? Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 17(1), 29–39. doi ↗
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi ↗
|
|---|
| Substantive and disciplinary knowledge | The pair of terms now used across subject curricula: what a subject holds to be established, and how it establishes it (Ofsted, 2021a, 2021b). The distinction goes back to Schwab, and reached teaching through Shulman (1986). | | - Ofsted. (2021a). Research review series: History. gov.uk ↗
- Ofsted. (2021b). Research review series: Science. gov.uk ↗
- Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi ↗
|
|---|