Gerald Ajam

Work / Guides / Introduction to Context Guides

Understanding the Context of Education

Short, sourced primers on the professional knowledge of education: what schools are for, how people learn and are taught, how curricula and assessments are made, how systems decide, and how the field knows and changes. Each corrects a common belief, maps the field and sets out the debates that are still open.

All guides

Why the series exists

Much of what goes wrong in education was known in advance

Reforms stall for reasons historians have described for a century. New tools repeat promises made for film and radio. Measures crowd out the aims they were meant to serve, and interventions that worked in one setting fail in the next. Most of this is documented. It sits in fields that people who come to education from elsewhere, and many who work inside it, never had time to read.

This series gathers that knowledge into short primers. It starts with what education is for and moves outward: how people learn and are taught, where learning happens, what is taught and judged, how schools and systems decide, and how the field knows things and changes.

1

Correct a belief

Each primer opens with a belief that sounds reasonable and is widely held, and shows what the evidence says instead.

2

Map the field

One central idea, one map and a working vocabulary, then five key ideas, each with its reasoning, a figure and the evidence behind it.

3

Show what is still argued

The live debates get the strongest case on each side, followed by what the ideas change for anyone who designs, teaches, leads, decides or builds.

Who it is for

Anyone who works in or on education and wants the ground under their feet

The primers assume no training in education. They are written to be useful to a first-year teacher and still worth an experienced leader's time, because each one gathers the evidence and the arguments in one place and says plainly where they are thin.

  • New and experienced teachers
  • School leaders
  • Policy and programme staff
  • Curriculum and resource developers
  • Designers and product teams
  • Researchers from other fields
  • Students of education
  • Parents and board members

How each primer is built

One file, three views, one skeleton

PartWhat it does
OpeningThe title, who the primer is for, the series shelf, and the five ideas in brief
I · The ground01 The belief and why it fails. 02 The map: one central idea, a figure of the field and the key vocabulary
II · Five ideas03 to 07, one idea each: the claim, a figure, the evidence, a worked or Singapore example, then readings that hold up against readings that mislead
III · Debates and practice08 The live debates, each argued from both sides. 09 In practice: what to ask, what to look for, what to beware of
CloseQuestions to ask of any plan, a closing line and further reading
ReferenceA glossary, models and frameworks at a glance, a Singapore note, notes on the evidence, and an APA reference list with links
Slides
About 50 slides that fit any screen, with a Read more panel for the argument and the sources, and print-ready pages.
Longform
The same content as an article, with contents, illustrations, the four appendices and the reference list, printable as one document.
Posters
Ten A3 posters, two per idea: a reference poster with the full idea and a statement poster with one mark and one line.
One file
All three views come from the same content, so a correction made once appears everywhere. Each primer is a single HTML file that works offline.

What each primer contains

Twenty-four primers in six parts

Each card gives the belief the primer corrects and its five ideas. Core marks the twelve primers most worth reading first.

Part I

Purposes and foundations

3 primers

What education is for, where it came from, and who it serves.

Part II

Teaching and learning

4 primers

What happens in the room, and the professional judgement behind it.

Part III

Learning environments

2 primers

Where learning happens, and through what bodies and media.

Part IV

Curriculum and assessment

5 primers

What is taught, how it is made and renewed, and how anyone knows it was learnt.

Part V

Schools and systems

6 primers

Where decisions are made, funded, contested and enacted.

Part VI

Evidence and change

4 primers

How education knows things, judges its programmes, and changes slowly.

How the series was designed

The decisions behind the series, and what each one costs

01Organise from purpose outward

Decision

The primers run in six parts: purposes, teaching and learning, learning environments, curriculum and assessment, schools and systems, and evidence and change.

Why

Each part rests on the one before it. Aims shape teaching, teaching happens somewhere, and the curriculum, the system and the research all serve or constrain those choices.

Trade-off

Some topics belong to more than one part. Equity, for example, shapes learners, classrooms and funding, so primers point to each other rather than repeat.

02Write for anyone who works in or on education

Decision

The primers assume no training in education and address no single profession. There are no role-by-role sections.

Why

The same knowledge is missing in different places: a new teacher may lack the policy view, a policy officer the classroom view, and a designer both. One text that serves them all is easier to keep right.

Trade-off

Practical sections speak to anyone who designs, teaches, leads, decides or builds, so a reader in a specific role has to make the last translation.

03Five ideas per primer, not five habits

Decision

Each primer sets out five key ideas, each with its reasoning, a figure, the evidence, and the readings that hold up against the readings that mislead.

Why

The craft series teaches practice. This series builds judgement, which depends on understanding ideas well enough to apply them to new cases.

Trade-off

Ideas are harder to act on than habits, so each primer closes with a practical section and a list of questions to ask.

04Give the live debates their own section

Decision

Section eight of every primer sets out two or three debates, with the strongest case on each side and a note on what evidence can and cannot settle.

Why

Much of education is contested for good reasons: values differ, and the evidence is often thin or context-bound. Readers need to know where the ground is disputed before they build on it.

Trade-off

Presenting both sides fairly takes space, and some readers want a verdict the evidence cannot give.

05One home for every term

Decision

A term inventory of about 900 concepts, models and debates assigns each term to one primer. Other primers mention it and point to that home.

Why

Nothing is defined twice or differently, and gaps are visible before writing starts. The inventory was checked against the research literature, which added four primers and a part on learning environments.

Trade-off

Readers sometimes have to follow a pointer to get a full definition.

06Leave cognition and learning myths to existing guides

Decision

How memory and attention work stays in the Designing for Learning primer, and practices with weak evidence stay in the False Certainties field guide.

Why

Both are already written and checked. Repeating them would create two versions to maintain.

Trade-off

The learners primer is shorter on cognition than a reader might expect, and points elsewhere for it.

07A quieter material than the craft series

Decision

Grounds are low-chroma stone tints, one hue family per part, and spines carry a double band and a dotted edge. The engine, views and print paths are the same as the craft series.

Why

The craft series already uses the full colour wheel, so the context series is identified by chroma and a mark rather than by hue. Readers can tell the two shelves apart, even in greyscale.

Trade-off

Neighbouring primers within a part look alike. The part is the unit of identity, and the number tells volumes apart.

08Singapore as a worked case, on the public record

Decision

Each primer carries a Singapore appendix built from published ministry and parliamentary sources, with anything that may have changed marked for checking.

Why

A concrete system makes abstract ideas testable, and Singapore is the system most readers will work in. Public sources keep the primers safe to share.

Trade-off

Policy moves faster than the primers are revised, so the appendix dates its sources.

Two series, two axes

The craft series explains how products are made; this one explains the world they enter

CRAFT SERIES · 22 GUIDES

Guides for educational technologists

Organised by the life of a learning product, from why build it to whether it lasts. Each guide corrects a misconception, teaches five habits and shows where the practice breaks in education.

Read the introduction
CONTEXT SERIES · 24 PRIMERS

Understanding the Context of Education

Organised from the purposes of education outward. Written for a general reader, it supplies the knowledge the craft guides assume: aims, learners, pedagogy, curriculum, assessment, policy, research and reform.

The two sets can be read together. Craft guide 14, on data strategy, reads differently once assessment systems (C14) has shown why any reported measure becomes a target. Craft guide 19, on adoption, is sharper after education reform (C23) has explained why system change is slow.

The evidence standard

Every claim is checked before it is used

Before drafting

Each primer starts from a claims register: every number, quotation, date and citation, checked at source before drafting. Claims that cannot be verified are dropped or marked as unverified in the text. Quotations reached only through secondary sources are marked as such, and invented examples are labelled as illustrative.

Inside every primer

Contested findings are shown as contested, with the counter-evidence beside them. The written primers already carry examples: a famous 1913 prediction about film that was in fact made in 1922, a widely repeated claim that teachers make 1,500 decisions a day that traces to no study, and a classroom-design finding that explains 16% of the variation in progress rather than raising progress by 16%. Each primer's evidence appendix records what is strong, what is contested and what was set aside.

Understanding the Context of Education · All twenty-four written · September 2026

Singapore